Shoulder ultrasound for the rotator cuff

USG

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

Operator-dependent and position-dependent — anisotropy is the artefact that manufactures tears, and dynamic assessment is what ultrasound adds.

Orient first

  • ANISOTROPY is the dominant artefact and the commonest cause of a false-positive tear: a tendon looks artificially DARK when the beam is not perpendicular to its fibres. Correcting the angle and watching the hypoechoic area disappear is the test.
  • A full-thickness tear is a defect extending from the bursal to the articular surface, usually with fluid filling it and often with the overlying bursa and deltoid sagging into the gap.
  • The CRITICAL ZONE of supraspinatus, just posterior to the biceps and near its footprint, is where most tears begin — it is where to look hardest.
  • DYNAMIC assessment is what ultrasound offers over MRI: impingement on abduction, and subluxation of the biceps tendon on rotation, are seen in real time.
  • Fluid in the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa alone is non-specific; it accompanies tears but also bursitis.

Acquire the study

  • High-frequency linear probe, 10–15 MHz. Patient seated on a rotating stool so the shoulder can be positioned freely.
  • Use the standard positions: modified Crass or Crass for supraspinatus, arm in neutral external rotation for subscapularis, and internal rotation for infraspinatus.
  • Scan every tendon in TWO orthogonal planes — long and short axis — and never call a tear from one plane.
  • Set the focal zone at the tendon and keep the probe PERPENDICULAR to the fibres, heel-toeing to correct anisotropy.

The manoeuvre

  • Start with the biceps long head in short axis in the bicipital groove, then follow it in long axis; assess for subluxation, tenosynovitis and rupture.
  • Assess subscapularis in external rotation, in both planes.
  • Assess supraspinatus in the Crass or modified Crass position, in both planes, covering the critical zone and the footprint.
  • Assess infraspinatus and teres minor posteriorly.
  • When a hypoechoic area is seen, TOE the probe to change the angle and confirm it persists — anisotropy disappears, a tear does not.
  • For any tear, state whether it is partial (and which surface) or full-thickness, and measure it in the anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions.
  • Assess the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa for fluid and thickening.
  • Perform DYNAMIC assessment: abduct the arm and watch for impingement, and rotate to test biceps stability.
  • Assess the acromioclavicular joint and the greater tuberosity cortex for irregularity.

What confirms it

  • A full-thickness tear is a defect through the entire tendon in BOTH orthogonal planes, usually fluid-filled, with sagging of the overlying bursa.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • A tendon of uniform fibrillar echotexture in both planes, with the angle corrected, excludes a significant tear.
  • ⚠️ Ultrasound cannot assess the labrum, and assesses the intra-articular structures and the glenohumeral joint poorly. It does not exclude labral or intra-articular pathology — name MR arthrography where that is the question.
  • A massive retracted tear can be missed because the empty footprint is mistaken for a normal-looking area — check that the tendon is actually present, not just that the area looks uniform.

The classic misread

  • Calling anisotropy a tear.
  • Assessing in one plane only.
  • Missing a retracted tear by not confirming the tendon reaches its footprint.
  • Reporting bursal fluid as though it were a tear.

Reference values

Each value carries the caveat that keeps it from being misused. Normal limits and diagnostic criteria are kept apart on purpose: a disease cut-off read as a normal range is the more dangerous mistake.

Diagnostic criteria

  • Rotator cuff · Tendon thickness and tear depth — how to report them

    a uniformly fibrillar tendon without a defect; published thickness millimetres vary by tendon and athletic loading, so morphology (partial- vs full-thickness, retraction to a named landmark) outranks a universal thickness

    Do not invent a "normal supraspinatus is X mm". Full-thickness is a defect from articular to bursal surface. Fatty infiltration (Goutallier) is the repair-quality companion.

    USG · MRI

See it on real cases

Direct links to Radiopaedia — the reference article and worked cases with their images. Each opens on Radiopaedia.

Key papers

Reviews and guidelines from RSNA, ESR and related journals. Each opens at its DOI.

  1. Imaging algorithms for evaluating suspected rotator cuff disease: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement ↗Nazarian LN, Jacobson JA, Benson CB, et al. · Radiology 2013RSNA · PubMed
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis ↗Smith TO, Back T, Toms AP, et al. · Clinical Radiology 2011RCR · PubMed
  3. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis ↗de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, et al. · AJR 2009ARRS · PubMed
  4. The Evolving Roles of MRI and Ultrasound in First-Line Imaging of Rotator Cuff Injuries ↗Zoga AC, Kamel SI, Hynes JP, et al. · AJR 2021ARRS · PubMed

More searches

More in Musculoskeletal