Caesarean scar pregnancy

USG

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

A gestational sac implanted in the niche of a previous caesarean scar, with thin myometrium between sac and bladder and peritrophoblastic flow — distinguish it from a low intrauterine sac or a miscarriage in progress, because it leads to accreta or rupture.

Orient first

  • Incidence rises with caesarean rates; early diagnosis allows treatment before haemorrhage.
  • The sac is in the anterior lower segment at the scar, with an empty cavity and cervical canal.
  • Two types: on the scar (growing towards the cavity) and in the niche (growing towards the bladder) — the latter is more dangerous.

Acquire the study

  • Transvaginal ultrasound with colour and spectral Doppler; sagittal plane through the scar; transabdominal with a full bladder for myometrial thickness.

The manoeuvre

  • Sagittal plane: sac location relative to the scar and the internal os; empty uterine cavity and cervical canal.
  • Myometrial thickness between sac and bladder in mm.
  • Colour Doppler: high-velocity, low-resistance peritrophoblastic flow around the sac.
  • Sliding sign: gentle probe pressure does not move the sac (unlike a miscarriage in progress).
  • Embryo and cardiac activity; CRL in mm.

What confirms it

  • A sac embedded in the scar niche with thin anterior myometrium and peritrophoblastic flow, with an empty cavity and cervix.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • A sac that slides on probe pressure without flow is a miscarriage in progress, not a scar pregnancy.

The classic misread

  • Calling a low intrauterine pregnancy normal without looking at the scar.

More searches

More in Women’s and fetal