Acute pancreatitis

CT · MRI

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

The diagnosis is usually clinical and biochemical. The imaging questions are the CAUSE, the NECROSIS and the COMPLICATIONS — and timing decides what you can answer.

Orient first

  • CT in the first 48–72 hours UNDERSTATES necrosis, because necrosis takes days to declare itself. An early scan that looks mild is not reassurance, and reporting it as such is a real harm.
  • The two things that change management are the CAUSE (gallstones need intervention) and NECROSIS with its complications.
  • Collections are named by age and content, and the names carry management: acute peripancreatic fluid collection and pseudocyst contain fluid; acute necrotic collection and walled-off necrosis contain solid debris. Calling walled-off necrosis a pseudocyst leads to a drain that fails.

Acquire the study

  • Contrast-enhanced CT in the PORTAL VENOUS or pancreatic parenchymal phase — non-enhancing parenchyma is the definition of necrosis, so a non-contrast study cannot assess it. Say so explicitly if contrast was withheld for renal function.
  • Time it: for severity assessment, ideally 72 hours or later after onset.
  • Ultrasound is the study for the CAUSE — gallstones and duct calibre — not for severity.
  • MRI/MRCP is better for duct integrity and for characterising solid debris within a collection.

The manoeuvre

  • Assess the pancreatic parenchyma for enhancement, and estimate the PROPORTION that fails to enhance — that is the necrosis.
  • Look at the peripancreatic fat and retroperitoneum for stranding and fluid.
  • Characterise every collection: site, size, wall maturity, and crucially whether contents are pure fluid or contain SOLID debris.
  • Look for the CAUSE: gallstones, a dilated CBD, a mass in the head, ductal disruption, features of chronic pancreatitis.
  • Assess the vessels: splenic vein, portal vein and SMV thrombosis; pseudoaneurysm (especially splenic and gastroduodenal arteries) — this is the bleed that kills.
  • Look for gas within the pancreas or a collection, which suggests infection.
  • Assess the bowel: colonic cut-off, ileus, ischaemia of the transverse colon.
  • Check the chest bases for effusions and consolidation.

What confirms it

  • Non-enhancing pancreatic parenchyma on a properly contrast-enhanced study after 72 hours defines necrosis.
  • Gas in a collection, or a new clinical deterioration with a collection, suggests infected necrosis.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • ⚠️ A CT in the first 72 hours cannot exclude necrosis. Report the timing explicitly and say what the study can and cannot settle.
  • A non-contrast CT cannot assess necrosis at all.
  • Normal cross-sectional imaging does not exclude acute pancreatitis — the diagnosis is clinical and biochemical.

The classic misread

  • Reporting "mild pancreatitis" on a day-1 scan.
  • Calling walled-off necrosis a pseudocyst because the wall looks mature — look for solid debris inside.
  • Missing a pseudoaneurysm because the arterial phase was never obtained in a patient who bled.
  • Reporting severity from an ultrasound.

Reference values

Each value carries the caveat that keeps it from being misused. Normal limits and diagnostic criteria are kept apart on purpose: a disease cut-off read as a normal range is the more dangerous mistake.

Diagnostic criteria

  • Acute pancreatitis · Revised Atlanta severity — how to report it

    a named classification: mild (no organ failure, no local complication), moderately severe, or severe (persistent organ failure beyond 48 hours)

    Severity is a CLINICAL grade that imaging supports — interstitial versus necrotising morphology is the imaging half, and it does not by itself assign "severe". Persistent organ failure, not necrosis percentage, defines the severe grade. Versioned criterion — verify against the current edition before clinical use.

    CT · MRI

  • Pancreas (necrosis) · Necrosis extent on a contrast-enhanced CT

    a named estimate: non-enhancing pancreatic parenchyma after an adequate pancreatic-phase study, often binned as under 30%, 30–50%, or over 50%

    Necrosis cannot be judged on a scan in the first 72 hours — hypoperfusion then is often reversible. An unenhanced or poorly timed study cannot support a percentage. State the phase and the delay from onset. Versioned criterion — verify against the current edition before clinical use.

    CT

  • Peripancreatic collections · Naming of pancreatitis collections by age of the collection

    the four-week boundary is the naming rule: acute peripancreatic fluid collection becomes pseudocyst, acute necrotic collection becomes walled-off necrosis

    The name depends on TIME FROM ONSET and on whether the collection contains necrosis — a "pseudocyst" reported in week one is a classification error that changes management discussions. Versioned criterion — verify against the current edition before clinical use.

    CT · MRI

See it on real cases

Direct links to Radiopaedia — the reference article and worked cases with their images. Each opens on Radiopaedia.

Key papers

Reviews and guidelines from RSNA, ESR and related journals. Each opens at its DOI.

  1. Revised Atlanta Classification for Acute Pancreatitis: A Pictorial Essay ↗Foster BR, Jensen KK, Bakis G, et al. · RadioGraphics 2016RSNA · PubMed
  2. The revised Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis: a CT imaging guide for radiologists ↗Sheu Y, Furlan A, Almusa O, et al. · Emergency Radiology 2012ASER · PubMed
  3. Acute pancreatitis: an update on the revised Atlanta classification ↗Colvin SD, Smith EN, Morgan DE, et al. · Abdominal Radiology 2020SAR · PubMed
  4. Imaging guidelines for acute pancreatitis: when and when not to image ↗Rocha APC, Schawkat K, Mortele KJ · Abdominal Radiology 2020SAR · PubMed

More searches

More in Acute and on-call