Reading a fibrotic interstitial lung disease pattern

CT

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

On HRCT, place the fibrosis (basal, peripheral, upper, peribronchovascular), name its features (reticulation, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing), then assign the pattern: UIP, probable UIP, indeterminate, or an alternative diagnosis.

Orient first

  • Honeycombing is clustered, subpleural cystic spaces with shared walls, usually in layers — not paraseptal emphysema and not traction bronchiectasis seen end-on.
  • A UIP pattern is basal and subpleural predominant with honeycombing; probable UIP has the same distribution with traction bronchiectasis but no honeycombing.
  • Features that suggest ANOTHER diagnosis: upper or mid-zone predominance, peribronchovascular distribution with subpleural sparing (NSIP), mosaic attenuation with air trapping (hypersensitivity pneumonitis), extensive ground glass, nodules, consolidation.

Acquire the study

  • Volumetric thin-section non-contrast CT at full inspiration (supine), expiratory images for air trapping, and prone images to separate dependent atelectasis from early fibrosis.

The manoeuvre

  • Axial and coronal: craniocaudal and axial distribution of the abnormality.
  • Reticulation and traction bronchiectasis/bronchiolectasis on thin sections.
  • Honeycombing: subpleural clustered cysts on the lung window, confirmed on sagittal and coronal reformats.
  • Ground glass: its extent relative to fibrosis.
  • Expiratory images: lobular air trapping (three or more lobules in more than one lobe suggests hypersensitivity pneumonitis).
  • Prone images: dependent opacity that clears is atelectasis, not fibrosis.
  • Extrapulmonary clues: oesophageal dilatation (scleroderma), pleural plaques (asbestosis), pulmonary artery size.

What confirms it

  • A named pattern category (UIP / probable UIP / indeterminate / alternative) built from distribution plus features.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • Absence of honeycombing does not exclude IPF — probable UIP in the right clinical context is often enough for the MDT.

The classic misread

  • Calling paraseptal emphysema honeycombing.
  • Calling dependent atelectasis fibrosis without prone images.
  • Giving a single diagnosis instead of a pattern — the diagnosis is multidisciplinary.

See it on real cases

Direct links to Radiopaedia — the reference article and worked cases with their images. Each opens on Radiopaedia.

Key papers

Reviews and guidelines from RSNA, ESR and related journals. Each opens at its DOI.

  1. Current State of Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Imaging ↗Chelala L, Brixey AG, Hobbs SB, et al. · Radiology 2025RSNA · PubMed
  2. CT in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Diagnosis and Beyond ↗Gruden JF · AJR 2016ARRS · PubMed
  3. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the radiologist's role in making the diagnosis ↗Mohning MP, Richards JC, Huie TJ · British Journal of Radiology 2019BIR · PubMed
  4. Advances in Concept and Imaging of Interstitial Lung Disease ↗Yanagawa M, Han J, Wada N, et al. · Radiology 2025RSNA · PubMed

More searches

More in Chest