Reading sinus CT before endoscopic sinus surgery

CT

First and second year — the floor first, then every step

Stage the disease (Lund–Mackay), map the drainage pathways (ostiomeatal unit, frontal recess, sphenoethmoidal recess), and flag the anatomical danger points — Keros depth, lamina papyracea, Onodi cell, dehiscent optic nerve or ICA — for the surgeon.

Orient first

  • CT is done after medical treatment; it maps anatomy rather than diagnosing symptoms.
  • Lund–Mackay scores each sinus 0–2 and the ostiomeatal complex 0/2 (verify).
  • Keros classification of the olfactory fossa depth predicts skull base injury risk.

Acquire the study

  • Non-contrast CT paranasal sinuses, 0.6–1 mm, coronal and sagittal reformats, bone window (low-dose protocol).

The manoeuvre

  • Coronal bone window: ostiomeatal unit patency; uncinate process and infundibulum.
  • Score each sinus (Lund–Mackay); note polyps and hyperdense content (fungal, allergic).
  • Olfactory fossa depth in mm on coronal slices: Keros type 1–3; asymmetry.
  • Lamina papyracea dehiscence; anterior ethmoidal artery position.
  • Sagittal reformat: frontal recess cells; sphenoid: Onodi cell, optic nerve and ICA dehiscence.

What confirms it

  • Mucosal disease with obstructed drainage pathways in a patient with chronic symptoms after medical therapy.

What licenses you to exclude it

  • Clear sinuses and patent drainage pathways after treatment make chronic rhinosinusitis unlikely as the cause of symptoms.

The classic misread

  • Unilateral opacification with bone erosion or calcification — consider inverted papilloma or tumour, not simple sinusitis.

More searches

More in Neuro and head & neck